Everything about U And Non-u English totally explained
| U |
Non-U |
| Bike or Bicycle |
Cycle |
| Dinner Jacket |
Dress Suit |
| Knave |
Jack (cards) |
| Vegetables |
Greens |
| Ice |
Ice Cream |
| Scent |
Perfume |
| They've a very nice house. |
They have a lovely home. |
| Ill (in bed) |
Sick (in bed) |
| I was sick on the boat. |
I was ill on the boat. |
| Looking-Glass |
Mirror |
| Chimneypiece |
Fireplace |
| Graveyard |
Cemetery |
| Spectacles |
Glasses |
| False Teeth |
Dentures |
| Die |
Pass on |
| Mad |
Mental |
| Jam |
Preserve |
| Napkin |
Serviette |
| Sofa |
Settee or Couch |
| Lavatory or Loo |
Toilet |
| Rich |
Wealthy |
| What? |
Pardon? |
| Good health |
Cheers |
| Lunch |
Dinner (for midday meal) |
| Pudding |
Sweet |
| Drawing-room |
Lounge |
| Writing-paper |
Note-paper |
| How d'you do? |
Pleased to meet you |
| (School)master, mistress |
Teacher |
U and non-U English usage, with
U standing for
upper class, and
non-U representing the aspiring
middle classes, were part of the terminology of popular discourse of social dialects (
sociolects) in
1950s Britain and the
northeast United States. The debate didn't concern itself with the speech of the working classes, which in many instances used the same words as the upper class.
The debate was set in motion in
1954 by the British linguist Professor Alan S C Ross. He coined the terms
U and
non-U in an article on the difference that
social class makes to
English language usage, which was published in a Finnish professional linguistics journal. His article covered differences of
pronunciation and
writing style, but it was his attention to differences of
vocabulary that received the most attention.
The English author
Nancy Mitford was alerted and immediately took up the usage in an essay, “The English Aristocracy” that was published by
Stephen Spender in his magazine
Encounter in 1954. Mitford provided a glossary of terms used by the upper-classes, some of which are in the table at right, unleashing an anxious national debate about English class-consciousness and
snobbery, which involved a good deal of soul-searching that itself provided fuel for the fires. The essay was reprinted, with contributions by
Evelyn Waugh,
John Betjeman and others, as well as Ross's original article, as
Noblesse Oblige: an Inquiry into the Identifiable Characteristics of the English Aristocracy in
1956. Betjeman's poem
How to Get on in Society concluded the collection.
The U and non-U issue could have been taken lightheartedly, but at the time many took it very seriously. This was a reflection of the anxieties of the
middle class in 1950s Britain, recently emerged from
post-war austerities. In particular the media used it as a launch pad for many stories, making much more out of it than was first intended. In the meantime, the idea that one might “improve oneself” by adopting the culture and manner of one's “betters,” instinctively assented to before
World War II, was now greeted with resentment.
Refinements of language usage that identify the speaker are nothing new: see
shibboleth and
précieuses. Aristocrats are not the only social group that define themselves by linguistic usages that identify outsiders: compare U.S.
AAVE and the Southern U.S.
good ol' boy network, and see also
Street cred. Many of the words were slightly outdated by the 1950s, being more typical of the 1850s; unlike some other groups the English aristocracy and middle class were not self-consciously adopting a new group vocabulary, but hadn't changed in using some words during a century of great social changes.
Some of the terms and the ideas behind them were largely obsolete by the late 20th century, when, in the United Kingdom,
reverse snobbery led younger members of the British upper and middle classes to adopt elements of working class speech (see:
Estuary English and
Mockney). There must be very few people who today use the term “looking-glass” in preference to “mirror.” Many, if not most, of the differences however are still very much current - and therefore perfectly usable - as
class-indicators.
Further Information
Get more info on 'U And Non-u English'.
|
External Link Exchanges
Do you know how hard it is to get a link from a large encyclopaedia? Well we're different and will prove it. To get a link from us just add the following HTML to your site on a relevant page:
<a href="http://u_and_non-u_english.totallyexplained.com">U and non-U English Totally Explained</a>
Then simply click through this link from your web page. Our crawlers will verify your link, extract the title of your web page and instantly add a link back to it. If you like you can remove the words Totally Explained and embed the link in article text.
As long as your link remains in place, we'll keep our link to you right here. Please play fair - our crawlers are watching. Your site must be closely related to this one's topic. Any kind of spamming, dubious practises or removing the link will result in your link from us being dropped and, potentially, your whole site being banned. |